From my reading of the reality of the statement issued by Al-Azhar, yesterday, we can say that he will not spend a long time until we come out of the demands that the military character of Al-Azhar Sheikh, or a civilian with military background. It can, also, be regarded as the difference between the Sheikh of Al-Azhar, Ahmed al-Tayeb, and his deputy, the article ordered the coup, which Winkle in now Cairo University, Dr. Hassan El-Shafei, is the same as the difference between Ibn Khaldun and Ezz Bin Abdulsalam. Ibn Khaldun, to his knowledge, he chose to bend in front of the commander of the Mongol invasion of Tamerlane, and sells scientific value and the nation, and his turban, for a gain satisfaction tyrant, while Ezz chose Imam Ibn Abd al-Salam (Izz al-Din and Sultan seller kings and scientists). The statement issued by the chiefdom, yesterday, comes three days after the anniversary of the massacre committed by the coup forces in Rabi'a the field and the rest of the fields of the sit-in before, to exonerate the killers and condemns those killed, and Amali criminals and trample on the bodies of the victims, he says, in the words look beyond just the moral affairs directly, “Indeed, the current rulers of Egypt did not kill anyone, but the killers are the ones who Grroa demonstrators and protesters from their followers and Ovetohm, and analyzed them armed out of the army, police and people in order to rule the people, in spite of their noses. And they pushed the children of the poor and the gullible into destruction and death, while many Kpraihm enjoy living well, under the protection of malevolent governments of Egypt and its people”. It denies the statement “Alozakari or Alasohra” The charge against those who called them “Egypt's rulers” They present “Zaheroa enemies of the nation and the Zionists LuaLua”, And stir verse and accused what he calls “Muslim Brotherhood system” That “Nasser, who is the enemies of the nation and the rule of Egypt a year in which not openly hostile attitude toward one's enemies Egypt and predators”. The Sheikh of Al Azhar and the legal adviser, handsome young, they show the full support of President Mohamed Morsi during the national dialogue that was going on in the Federal Palace sessions, under the siege of the counter-revolution, with the full support of the army and police, the president in his palace, before the implementation of the coup A few months later, so why not accept Sheikh Al-Azhar and the legal adviser to participate in meetings in the presence of the head of all these qualities and vices contained a statement yesterday? The statement goes on to deny the separation of university professors, imams and preachers, saying, “Did not happen once and that a separation of university professors or teachers or imams, or preachers, except of them took advantage of a niche of science and advocacy platforms to promote ideas stray pose an imminent threat to society, or quit his job and joined the enemies of the homeland”. Note Alrkakh me in ignorance, and full of evading conscience and respect, while Starter statement uses the words “Finally it did not happen”, Then at the end of a long sentence says “Except”, Suggesting that it wrote, or dictated writing, does not increase in size from the tiny bottles of young chieftains coup, mezzo and appearance, etc. Sheikh Al-Azhar did it, in such a time two years ago, when he peered his face, after brandishing i'tikaaf after the massacre of the Republican Guard, proposing what they called the initiative, before the implementation of a fourth three-day crime, has been commented on at the time by saying “The announcement of a new political movement of Al-Azhar Sheikh coincides with the announcement of plans for security and moves to break into a fourth Aatsama Adawiya and the renaissance of Egypt and Vdahma by force, through the so-called plan «Horseshoe and pincer» and the fear of being the so-called «Al-Azhar initiative» other political pliers , is intended to put forward that are rejected by those who adhere to legitimacy, and will show them in front of everyone Kmattlin for peaceful solutions, and then no one should object to the use of force in dealing with the sit-ins. And surprised that in the moment that it was not Al-Azhar has begun his contacts to promote his initiative after, and before that one knows to this initiative straight from the feet, choir coup lead to Hanna and one single text says there is no argument to prevent break up sit-ins by force after the rejection of the Muslim Brotherhood to the initiative of Sheikh Al-Azhar began”. Indeed, it was what I knew at the initiative of Al-Azhar Sheikh bridge that crossed the crime was committed forces, the legitimate cover, and who tried the coup hide the leaders under him, and we thought that two years ago on this shame are enough to wake up the conscience of the chiefdom, especially with all the insults and obscenities made by the coup to the shrine of Al-Azhar authority , on the tongues and appropriateness artists precedents, and advocates of television cameramen, made in the basements of the security establishment, but the reality of the situation it proves that it is not permissible for a Balttehr, sinks, bidets, under the authority know how to humiliate and brutalize including jumps outside the walls of the fold.
نقلا عن العربي الجديد