Velayat-e faqih invented by Khomeini's roots date back to the Safavid Shah Ismail..
The idea of the mind to transport its roots back to Mu'tazila..
The scourge of thinking rooted in band Kharijites..
Each contemporary intellectual disease inevitably find his roots precedent devoted to him, and alluded, to come contemporaries to revive.
* Was not the emergence of secularism in Turkey began in the era of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, but was preceded by the Sultan Mahmud II, which was leaked to Turkey's secular ideas in his reign by Turkish students who have studied in the West, particularly in France.
* Mansour Abdul Hakim says in his book ( Turkey of succession to modernity - from Ataturk to Erdogan):
“I knew secular ideas in Turkey beginning on behalf of Westernization, which appeared in the reign of Sultan Mahmud II, who took power in the eighteenth century, where he set up a new army along the lines of European armies and replaced the administrative laws of new laws along the lines of European laws also issued laws on dress and forced staff and military wear a fez and shaving the beard”.
Turkish people opposed this strongly expatriate Western appearances, and blocked attempts by the Sultan of the trend towards the secular West, where is the early stages of secular Westernization in support of the separation of religion from the state and the affairs of life, the people and then fired on the Sultan Mahmud II title “Sultan Infidel”.
* Although the Sultan Mahmud his efforts in the movement of reconstruction, facilities and reconstruction of the famous mosques, but his main concern has departed to simulate the West, but I wish I was limited to that in modern science industries, but it may be imported as well as the habits that was a prelude to the secularization of the country, and that it has introduced dress European government officials and forced civilians and military personnel to wear in the workplace.
* In the nineteenth century, secular rebel figures emerged on the Ottoman conditions aimed at the likes of the secularization of Turkey “Namik Kemal” And”Ziya Gökalp Bash”, As the foundations of the affected young French culture as a result of receiving the Education, Youth Ottoman Assembly in 1865.
These young people and politicians to prepare a new constitution has, and called for the opening of Parliament and the granting of sovereignty in ruling the Turkish people as the western, The form of these base for the secular regime in Turkey after a work in progress inside and outside Turkey in secret and in public, and building floor of the new political system.
* These youth movements are fertile ground that Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the purpose of the secular system after he took the reins, it is curious that initially keen on the appearance of a religious, and he himself delivered the Friday sermon in the city of “Bali a broken”.
And he appointed his assistants of the Sufi orders after he presided over the Grand National Council, and only to circumvent the religious Turkish people.
But Ataturk's secular orientation did not hide if he immediately changed the lifestyle of a Turkish Islamic character, and replaced by a regime hostile to the secular rituals of Islam and its principles.
*Public 1924 Ataturk abolished the words of the Turkish Constitution “The official state religion (Islam)” WordPress in the Turkish Constitution that the State does not recognize any religion although most Turks are Muslim, although Turkey was leading the Islamic world.
Ataturk's abolition of the religious Sharia courts …
* Since 1925 It seeks to Westernization of Turkey in its culture and civilization, and make the army guard the secular system, which is fighting Islamic appearances, and has issued several laws to the dominance of the secular Appearance.
It abolished the laws derived from Islamic law in personal status cases where Muslim gave women the right to marry a non-Muslim, the right to change their religion, and gender equality in inheritance.
And the granting of the right of a father to recognize his son from the Ripper which is contrary to Islamic law…
Ataturk fought veil women and committed Balsfor otherwise tried their husbands and guardians.
* The Ataturk alienating education through the consolidation of schools, and replaced the Arabic script in Latin characters to separate the Turks for their heritage.
Secular Ataturk was not going to Western secularism format that separates religion from the state and launches freedoms of individuals, but was secularism dictatorship based on the idea of nationalism so that the link between the people home relationship away from religion, as it is and to show the equality of the people he beat up the influence of the aristocracy and the clergy, which is what is known as the idea “People”.
* On the Ataturk state tool to impose secularism and Westernization, and circulated the idea of revolution to all the prevailing conventional conditions, such as forcing people to the concept that he sees it is to practice their religion.
* The most dangerous thing he has done that Ataturk made the institution of the army that protects the tyranny of the secular system, and fought against the infiltration of any appearance of Islamic manifestations into military barracks.
Indeed, the army intervened to foil any attempt to return the Islamic character and overthrow God's mercy Adnan Menderes in 1960, and was sentenced to death for high treason, which not only allow certain Islamic appearances in Turkey.
Ataturk, the army and keen not to remain alone solo protects secularism, but rather focused on the secularization of the judiciary and the media, which has had a prominent role in maintaining the secular Layout.
* Otatok have died and behind the savage effects of secularism, and completed Kemalists march on the same path, The group of (Aydin Dogan) Has more than 60% From the media and it is based on lobbying against governments that deviate from Ataturk's secular approach, and the most prominent example of this army to turn them Necmettin Erbakan in 1997.
The Supreme Court of the Constitution and the Supreme Administrative Courts and the courts are sentencing in favor of the secular system, where closed Islam-orientated parties such as welfare and the Virtue Party and the National Peace.
* As it was from the effects of dominance secular Atatürk group (Sbanga) Economically powerful, and a group (Koc) That work on the continuation of a secular Ataturk in this state.
Mansour says Abdul Hakim: “Of measures approved by the Kemalists in Turkey to consolidate the secular Atatürk and imposed by force :
The abolition of polygamy system recognized by Islam and absolved in the Qur'an.
Turkish Muslim marriage of Christian and Jewish or non-Muslim legalization and this is contrary to the law.
Prevent women from wearing the hijab and to hold their husbands or their parents that they have done.
Prevent the imams from wearing the abaya outside the mosque.
Converting major mosques to museums.
Making an official holiday on Sunday instead of Friday.
Allow any Turkish change his religion.
Abolition of the Turkish language written in Arabic characters and replace them with Latin letters.
Cancel the position of Shaykh al-Islam and the Ministry of Awqaf and religious education”.
* We can say that secularism is rooted in Turkish society, private institutions, the Justice and Development Party and the over 13 Years to tame the secular, to restore the Turkish people to the Ottoman roots, and has already returned many Islamic manifestations that Ran the dust of secularism in Turkey again.
It was Erdogan's secular Anadz Baalmanathm, and demanding its response to the Western pattern, a secular democracy does not secular authoritarian dictatorship, The West excludes religion with ideas, not with iron and fire, and religious freedom is guaranteed in Europe and the West, so why imported aside from the idea and left the rest?
Was the logic of freedoms is that Erdogan walked him to face the secular, we say that we are a democratic country, not the hijab does not become personal freedom like the unveiling?
You say that we are a democratic country, why not let the people all of whom practice their religion as they wish?
* We can say that the party's success in Turkey easy management and promoted the Islamic idea, especially since the Turkish people contrary to the rumors about him, is a devout people, he loves religion, and loves its origins and its roots and identity.
Hence I wonder:
Which is better to board a tank and the intervention of the ruling palace to burn the palace of the Afiktlk guards you and Siqldk After that attempt failed .. Or to work in the same palace and convince working with you and with the guards that the driver of the tank that is not an enemy but probably has a point of view and deserves to hear it.. And that even if it is not his sword months Boukhain but ignorant hasty.. Do not think that the solution but destruction and cleansing disabled languages?
Which is better to burn your country and shed the blood of unsuspecting and vulnerable and unsuspecting their homes in order to devote your idea or to use the same tools enemy Vtantsr it the same day by what Okhaddek him?
the source : Leave Press